Topic summary
⁠81%5 analyzed articles/videos943 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bari Weiss results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.1% saturation with 2,161 hits. Analysis detected 15,867 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,259 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (6,714 of 16,191 topics). This Bari Weiss is worse (more manipulative) than 58.50% of the peer group.
Bari Weiss
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 10,259
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510058.5% percentile
3.4% BS Score5 analyzed articles10.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.1%10.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 21.1%21.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 11.3%11.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.7%8.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 7.2%7.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 21.1%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 1.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Horn Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos