Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos274 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bank Of Japan results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 22.4% saturation with 245 hits. Analysis detected 1,830 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,096 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (1,616 of 16,562 topics). This Bank Of Japan is worse (more manipulative) than 90.20% of the peer group.
Bank Of Japan
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,096
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

90% percentile
025507510090.2% percentile
8.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 22.4%22.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 19.9%19.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.5%13.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 8.8%8.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 21.2%21.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 6.2%6.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.0%3.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 21.2%, sitewide 26.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 22.4%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 19.9%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.5%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 9.1%Recency Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.9%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.0%Red Herring: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos