Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos3,193 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Baking results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 21.8% saturation with 2,469 hits. Analysis detected 16,961 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,351 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (7,366 of 16,562 topics). This Baking is worse (more manipulative) than 55.50% of the peer group.
Baking
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 11,351
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510055.5% percentile
3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 21.8%21.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.6%14.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.4%12.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 20.8%20.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.3%4.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.5%2.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.3%4.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 26.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 21.8%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 20.8%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.1%Anecdotal: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Straw Man: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos