Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,772 analyzed words
BS Summary: These J. Bryan Lowder results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 492 hits. Analysis detected 3,792 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,088 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (5,275 of 6,628 authors). This J. Bryan Lowder is better (less manipulative) than 79.60% of the peer group.
J. Bryan Lowder
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠21%J. Bryan Lowder (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,088
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

20% percentile
025507510020.4% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.4%4.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.8%1.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 6.9%6.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.2%4.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.9%2.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Author 6.9%, sitewide 0.0%Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos