Topic summary
⁠2%4 analyzed articles/videos3,592 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Awards results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Authority, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 4.6% saturation with 659 hits. Analysis detected 4,553 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,375 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (15,716 of 15,769 topics). This Awards is better (less manipulative) than 99.70% of the peer group.
Awards
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 14,375
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.3% percentile
0.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles14.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos