Author summary
74% 5 analyzed articles/videos 5,685 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mike Davis results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 2,757 hits . Analysis detected 27,593 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,942 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 51% (3,104 of 6,244 authors). This Mike Davis is worse (more manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group. Mike Davis
Author details
Total words: 21,942
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.3% percentile 2.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles21.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.6% 12.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.6% 11.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.2% 9.2% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 5.0% 5.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.2%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.8%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 6.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Author 5.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 3.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Straw Man: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst