Fox News89%

MIKE DAVIS: Dissecting the Supreme Court's 'birthright' betrayal 87%

By Mike Davis75%

7/2/2026, 10:06:42 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 58.4% saturation with 735 hits. Analysis detected 4,785 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,259 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 79.7% and a BS Rank of 87% (2,875 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 86.90% of the article peer group.

The Supreme Court just delivered its most disastrous ruling in generations in Trump v. 
Barbara. 
Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined the three liberal justices to block President Donald Trump's executive order and hand over birthright citizenship to the children of tens of millions of illegal aliens and birth tourists from China and other enemy nations. 
The majority ruled that the 14th Amendment, which was passed after the Civil War to give former slaves equal rights, mandates citizenship to nearly anyone born on U.S. soil, even if they entered illegally, even if they’re a foreigner who hates America, even if they’re only here on a temporary visa and even if they are gaming our system as a Chinese birth tourist. 
Under this logic, American citizenship means nothing but birthplace. 
Forget heritage, patriotism or common values. 
All that matters is location. 
ALITO WARNS SUPREME COURT MADE 'SERIOUS MISTAKE' THAT COULD HAVE NATIONAL SECURITY CONSEQUENCES 
This decision destroys what it means to be an American. 
It ranks among the court's very worst, alongside Dred Scott v. 
Sandford (1857) and Roe v. 
Wade (1973). 
Justice Samuel Alito warned in dissent, "This is one of the most important decisions in the history of the Court, and in my judgment, the Court has made a serious mistake." 
Justice Alito is a gentleman. 
This was more than a serious mistake. 
John Roberts’ disastrous decision, joined by the court’s four women, could be fatal for our country. 
The damage cannot be overstated. 
At the core of sovereignty is the power to decide who enters the country and who becomes one of its citizens. 
Otherwise, we live at the mercy of billions of foreigners. 
Citizenship defines who shares in America's blessings and burdens, who upholds its values, who honors its history and who joins its social contract. 
It will ultimately determine whether the United States is a nation or just a place. 
The American people built the New York skyline, tamed a vast frontier, defeated fascism and communism, landed on the Moon and created the freest and most prosperous and powerful country in human history. 
Deciding who we invite to join us is the most consequential choice our nation can make. 
Once citizenship is granted, it is rarely undone. 
Citizenship confers full and equal rights, including the right to vote and claim every economic and social benefit. 
Yet this ruling puts the newborn child of an MS-13 gangster who crossed the border illegally days earlier on equal footing with the descendants of generations of Americans who fought world wars, built this country from nothing and died for its future. 
The national security implications are terrifying. 
As Justice Alito noted, a child born here to an enemy visitor from China or another hostile power, then raised abroad to hate the United States, would have lifelong citizenship and the right to vote in every election. 
That child could even run for president of the United States. 
TRUMP SUFFERS MAJOR SUPREME COURT DEFEAT AS JUSTICES UPHOLD BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP 
The votes of professors Roberts and Barrett, who call themselves originalists, are especially despicable. 
Anyone with a reasonable historical understanding of the 14th Amendment could never conclude it was intended to endow citizenship to children of illegal aliens or foreigners with no allegiance to this country. 
Ratified in 1868 to secure citizenship for freed slaves after the Civil War, the amendment's pivotal qualifier  "subject to the jurisdiction thereof"  deliberately excludes children of diplomats and children of invading soldiers. 
The Supreme Court recognized this principle in Elk v. 
Wilkins (1884), ruling that Native Americans born on reservations were not entitled to birthright citizenship under the amendment because they were subject to the jurisdiction of  and owed their allegiance to  their tribes instead of the United States. 
Congress later extended birthright citizenship to them by statute in 1924. 
If Native Americans born here and who have lived here for thousands of years are not constitutionally entitled to birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment, the children of illegal immigrants, foreign criminals and fraudster tourists certainly cannot be. 
Until now. 
The amendment's ratifiers could never have imagined, let alone intended, citizenship for the children of millions of unvetted illegals or for a birth-tourism industry that’s funneled hundreds of thousands of foreigners, especially from China, into the country for this purpose. 
But Roberts, Barrett and three liberals put their vanity over our sovereignty, national security and country. 
This ultimate betrayal is unforgivable. 
By deciding the case on sweeping constitutional grounds rather than a narrower statutory basis, the majority, including Roberts and Barrett, made fixing this catastrophe extraordinarily difficult. 
Reversing it now requires the passage of a constitutional amendment by two-thirds of both chambers of Congress and three-fourths of the states or a constitutional convention. 
They ignored the canon of constitutional avoidance, locked in a maximalist, ahistorical rule, and tied the hands of future majorities. 
Had they taken the narrower path, as Justice Kavanaugh argued, Congress could have legislated a fix. 
Justice Kavanaugh’s rationale was still wrong, but it wasn’t catastrophic, like Roberts’ ruling. 
With this decision, Roberts again prioritized his personal perception over constitutional duty. 
His legacy is one of preserving his own reputation at the expense of our nation when political pressure mounted. 
Time and again he has flinched  on Obamacare, on election cases, on immigration  choosing the path of least resistance and maximum elite approval. 
ICE SURGES ENFORCEMENT, MAKES 10,000 ARRESTS IN FIVE DAYS AMID SUPREME COURT BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP DECISION 
Justice Barrett's vote is particularly galling. 
Barrett auditioned as the next Justice Scalia, for whom she clerked. 
Her advocates sold her as the same. 
Yet Barrett helped deliver a ruling that ignores the amendment's text, history and limiting principles. 
This was a failure of character and of judgment that elevates abstract academic hypotheticals over real stakes: anchor babies for gang members, incentives for further surges of illegal immigration and the erosion of citizenship as a meaningful inheritance rather than a geographic accident. 
Originalism without regard for the sovereign interests it is supposed to protect is performative. 
Professor Barrett thinks she’s grading law-school exams instead of exercising sound judgment, proving why she’s the junior varsity justice who is not up to the job. 
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP 
The Trump administration must pursue mass deportations of all illegal immigrants, starting with women of childbearing age. 
Even if these illegals have "citizen" children, they must still be deported to prevent them from creating more fake citizens. 
Cutting federal funds for programs that benefit illegal immigrants, as well, will force the hands of those who exploit our generosity. 
Federal funds to states, cities and any other entities that provide benefits to illegal immigrants must also end. 
And the Trump Justice Department, under the all-star leadership of Todd Blanche, must continue to use all criminal and civil tools to sue, imprison, denaturalize and expel illegal aliens who have entered our country, attacked our citizens, plundered our treasure and debased our culture. 
The American people deserved better from Roberts and Barrett. 
Lifetime tenure exists precisely so justices can resist political fads and elite pressure. 
This abomination of a ruling destroys our sovereign power and duty  as We The People, the sovereign citizens of America  to define and control our own future. 
It amounts to national suicide by judicial decree. 
It is the ultimate betrayal by five unelected narcissists in robes. 
With no mercy, we must quadruple the mass deportations. 
And immediately. 
CLICK FOR MORE FROM MIKE DAVIS 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 11.9%Mike Davis: 5.9%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias11.9%This article: 0.0%Mike Davis: 0.5%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 8.0%Mike Davis: 3.1%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic8.0%This article: 1.8%Mike Davis: 0.3%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic1.8%This article: 1.4%Mike Davis: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias1.4%This article: 0.0%Mike Davis: 1.8%Fox Nation: 3.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 5.7%Mike Davis: 8.4%Fox Nation: 11.9%Framing Effect5.7%This article: 1.4%Mike Davis: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion1.4%This article: 1.0%Mike Davis: 1.3%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias1.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Davis: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.6%Mike Davis: 1.2%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias2.6%This article: 3.2%Mike Davis: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias3.2%This article: 50.2%Mike Davis: 12.6%Fox Nation: 10.8%Negativity Bias50.2%This article: 2.8%Mike Davis: 2.2%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias2.8%This article: 2.0%Mike Davis: 0.6%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error2.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Davis: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 9.5%Mike Davis: 7.9%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias9.5%This article: 4.0%Mike Davis: 4.8%Fox Nation: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias4.0%This article: 0.4%Mike Davis: 6.9%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect0.4%This article: 0.0%Mike Davis: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Davis: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.5%Mike Davis: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias5.5%This article: 1.3%Mike Davis: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect1.3%This article: 0.0%Mike Davis: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 19.4%Mike Davis: 5.3%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem19.4%This article: 6.2%Mike Davis: 2.8%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man6.2%This article: 8.7%Mike Davis: 3.4%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority8.7%This article: 12.8%Mike Davis: 1.4%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma12.8%This article: 9.8%Mike Davis: 2.4%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope9.8%This article: 0.0%Mike Davis: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 19.0%Mike Davis: 8.8%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization19.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Davis: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Davis: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 38.9%Mike Davis: 11.6%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion38.9%This article: 2.6%Mike Davis: 2.6%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question2.6%This article: 4.9%Mike Davis: 1.0%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.9%This article: 1.3%Mike Davis: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque1.3%This article: 2.5%Mike Davis: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof2.5%This article: 0.0%Mike Davis: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 3.0%Mike Davis: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division3.0%This article: 7.0%Mike Davis: 1.3%Fox Nation: 2.4%Anecdotal7.0%This article: 2.5%Mike Davis: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman2.5%This article: 3.7%Mike Davis: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.7%This article: 0.0%Mike Davis: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.0%Mike Davis: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground1.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Davis: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Davis: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Davis: 1.8%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.5%Mike Davis: 0.1%Fox Nation: 1.8%Unattributed Quote2.5%This article: 2.5%Mike Davis: 0.2%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection2.5%This article: 58.4%Mike Davis: 9.2%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice58.4%This article: 14.1%Mike Davis: 3.4%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination14.1%This article: 0.0%Mike Davis: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 45.5%Mike Davis: 5.0%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias45.5%This article: 1.1%Mike Davis: 0.5%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.1%

1259 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers3.1%attributed speech1,220writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
MIKE DAVIS • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 64 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageJustice Samuel Alito • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Justice Samuel Alito

100%flagged-word coverage
31 attributed words79% of attributed speech93% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Justice Samuel Alito: 100.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Justice Samuel Alito: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-59.6 ptsWriter: 59.6%Justice Samuel Alito: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -47.0 ptsWriter: 47.0%Justice Samuel Alito: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-14.5 ptsWriter: 14.5%Justice Samuel Alito: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -1.1 ptsWriter: 1.1%Justice Samuel Alito: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.