Topic summary
57% 7 analyzed articles/videos 3,421 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Automotive Technology results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 1,733 hits . Analysis detected 14,928 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,981 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 25% (12,531 of 16,562 topics). This Automotive Technology is better (less manipulative) than 75.70% of the peer group. Automotive Technology
Topic details
Total words: 15,981
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.3% percentile 2.0% BS Score7 analyzed articles16K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.8% 10.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 9.9% 9.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst