Topic summary
⁠69%1 analyzed article/video1,101 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Automated License Plate Readers (alpr) results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 407 hits. Analysis detected 3,286 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,303 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (7,151 of 16,562 topics). This Automated License Plate Readers (alpr) is worse (more manipulative) than 56.80% of the peer group.
Automated License Plate Readers (alpr)
Topic details
Total words: 3,303
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510056.8% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.9%6.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.3%11.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.4%11.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.3%12.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.7%3.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos