Topic summary
⁠40%3 analyzed articles/videos1,560 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Austin Music Scene results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Anecdotal, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 563 hits. Analysis detected 2,696 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,680 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (13,484 of 16,562 topics). This Austin Music Scene is better (less manipulative) than 81.40% of the peer group.
Austin Music Scene
Topic details
Total words: 4,680
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

19% percentile
025507510018.6% percentile
1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 12.0%12.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos