Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,218 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Atlanta Hawks results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29.4% saturation with 1,076 hits. Analysis detected 9,055 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,654 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (2,865 of 15,326 topics). This Atlanta Hawks is worse (more manipulative) than 81.30% of the peer group.
Atlanta Hawks
Topic details
Total words: 3,654
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

81% percentile
025507510081.3% percentile
6.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 29.4%29.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 12.3%12.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 10.3%10.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 14.7%14.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.7%8.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 14.4%14.4%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 7.4%7.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 5.3%5.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 29.4%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 26.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 22.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 11.1%Recency Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 2.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 1.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos