Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 529 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Assassination Threats results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 401 hits . Analysis detected 2,199 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,116 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 74% (4,328 of 16,562 topics). This Assassination Threats is worse (more manipulative) than 73.90% of the peer group. Assassination Threats
Topic details
Total words: 2,116
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.9% percentile 4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 11.3% 11.3% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 7.6% 7.6% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 18.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Recency Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst