Topic summary
⁠39%2 analyzed articles/videos606 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Apple Services results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Optimism Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 538 hits. Analysis detected 2,310 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,285 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (9,457 of 15,448 topics). This Apple Services is better (less manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group.
Apple Services
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,285
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510038.8% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 16.4%16.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos