Topic summary
⁠60%3 analyzed articles/videos949 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Apartments results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 839 hits. Analysis detected 7,829 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,294 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (8,481 of 16,516 topics). This Apartments is better (less manipulative) than 51.30% of the peer group.
Apartments
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,294
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

49% percentile
025507510048.7% percentile
2.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.7%9.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 11.5%11.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.7%8.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos