Topic summary
25%1 analyzed article/video1,326 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aortic Dissection results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 418 hits. Analysis detected 3,786 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,304 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (10,976 of 16,562 topics). This Aortic Dissection is better (less manipulative) than 66.30% of the peer group.
Aortic Dissection
Topic details
Total words: 5,304
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

34% percentile
025507510033.7% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.7%1.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos