Topic summary
6%1 analyzed article/video1,016 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ancient Weapons results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 221 hits. Analysis detected 1,103 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,048 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (14,181 of 16,562 topics). This Ancient Weapons is better (less manipulative) than 85.60% of the peer group.
Ancient Weapons
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,048
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

14% percentile
025507510014.4% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.3%7.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.2%1.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 2.2%2.2%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.4%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Indoctrination: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Middle Ground: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos