Topic summary
⁠20%1 analyzed article/video820 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ancient Hunting Practices results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 227 hits. Analysis detected 1,615 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,460 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (9,944 of 16,559 topics). This Ancient Hunting Practices is better (less manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group.
Ancient Hunting Practices
Topic details
Total words: 2,460
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

40% percentile
025507510040.0% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.8%5.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.9%5.9%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Red Herring: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos