Topic summary
⁠50%4 analyzed articles/videos2,752 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amy Coney Barrett results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Slippery Slope, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 2,209 hits. Analysis detected 15,008 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,015 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (10,031 of 16,562 topics). This Amy Coney Barrett is better (less manipulative) than 60.60% of the peer group.
Amy Coney Barrett
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510039.4% percentile
2.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles13K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.0%17.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.3%9.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.3%10.3%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 7.2%7.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 1.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Straw Man: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos