Topic summary
⁠55%1 analyzed article/video446 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ai's Impact On The Job Market results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 20.2% saturation with 270 hits. Analysis detected 1,576 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,338 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (3,878 of 16,562 topics). This Ai's Impact On The Job Market is worse (more manipulative) than 76.60% of the peer group.
Ai's Impact On The Job Market
Topic details
Total words: 1,338
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

77% percentile
025507510076.6% percentile
5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 20.2%20.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.3%12.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 9.2%9.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.8%5.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.7%9.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 4.6%4.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 20.2%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.2%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 4.6%Burden of Proof: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.5%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.2%Middle Ground: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos