Topic summary
⁠24%3 analyzed articles/videos1,062 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Air Defense Systems results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 619 hits. Analysis detected 4,932 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,900 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (13,392 of 16,562 topics). This Air Defense Systems is better (less manipulative) than 80.90% of the peer group.
Air Defense Systems
Topic details
Total words: 6,900
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

19% percentile
025507510019.1% percentile
1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.0%9.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.1%7.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos