Publication summary
ā 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These POLITICO results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 162 hits . Analysis detected 1,338 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,434 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ā 0% (0 of 379 publications). This POLITICO is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 1,434
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 11.3% 11.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 8.5% 8.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Publication 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.0% 4.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 9.0% 9.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Publication 6.5% 6.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 3.2% 3.2% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Publication 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 11.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 9.0%, sitewide 15.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 11.3%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Publication 6.5%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Publication 4.4%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst