Topic summary
⁠76%2 analyzed articles/videos1,425 analyzed words
BS Summary: These AI Vulnerabilities results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.1% saturation with 903 hits. Analysis detected 3,992 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,275 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (7,818 of 16,491 topics). This AI Vulnerabilities is worse (more manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group.
AI Vulnerabilities
Topic details
Total words: 4,275
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

53% percentile
025507510052.6% percentile
3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.6%3.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 21.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos