Topic summary
⁠27%2 analyzed articles/videos537 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ai Usage results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 883 hits. Analysis detected 4,793 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,323 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (7,327 of 16,562 topics). This Ai Usage is worse (more manipulative) than 55.80% of the peer group.
Ai Usage
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,323
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510055.8% percentile
3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.8%7.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 20.4%20.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 6.6%6.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 20.4%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.6%, sitewide 0.8%Horn Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos