Topic summary
⁠11%1 analyzed article/video614 analyzed words
BS Summary: These AI Training results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Anecdotal, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 256 hits. Analysis detected 1,236 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,456 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (11,565 of 16,562 topics). This AI Training is better (less manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group.
AI Training
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,456
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510030.2% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.4%10.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 8.8%8.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos