Topic summary
⁠45%2 analyzed articles/videos1,161 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ai Research results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.6% saturation with 1,108 hits. Analysis detected 5,517 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,020 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (5,645 of 16,562 topics). This Ai Research is worse (more manipulative) than 65.90% of the peer group.
Ai Research
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,020
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510065.9% percentile
3.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 23.7%23.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 27.6%27.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 6.5%6.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.1%6.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 27.6%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 23.7%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Horn Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos