Topic summary
60% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,945 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ai Policy results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Biased Writer Voice , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 1,587 hits . Analysis detected 18,347 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,775 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 47% (8,427 of 15,755 topics). This Ai Policy is better (less manipulative) than 53.50% of the peer group. Ai Policy
Topic details
Total words: 13,775
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.5% percentile 2.8% BS Score5 analyzed articles13.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.5% 11.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.6%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst