Topic summary
⁠21%2 analyzed articles/videos2,527 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ai In Medicine results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 994 hits. Analysis detected 6,412 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,108 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (14,484 of 16,562 topics). This Ai In Medicine is better (less manipulative) than 87.50% of the peer group.
Ai In Medicine
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 10,108
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

13% percentile
025507510012.5% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 9.8%9.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos