Topic summary
⁠51%2 analyzed articles/videos1,918 analyzed words
BS Summary: These AI Capabilities results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 970 hits. Analysis detected 7,638 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,048 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (9,422 of 16,510 topics). This AI Capabilities is better (less manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group.
AI Capabilities
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,048
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510042.9% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.6%11.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.8%13.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.5%13.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos