Author summary
63% 1 analyzed article/video 1,294 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anita Jain results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Authority , and Halo Effect , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 644 hits . Analysis detected 5,041 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,176 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 55% (2,891 of 6,359 authors). This Anita Jain is worse (more manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group. Anita Jain
Author details
Total words: 5,176
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.5% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.5% 7.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.8% 10.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 12.4% 12.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.8% 1.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.4%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 10.1%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.8%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 8.5%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.0% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Straw Man: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst