Topic summary
⁠37%4 analyzed articles/videos1,347 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aerospace Engineering results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Halo Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 1,057 hits. Analysis detected 7,841 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,848 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (8,708 of 15,929 topics). This Aerospace Engineering is better (less manipulative) than 54.70% of the peer group.
Aerospace Engineering
Topic details
Total words: 7,848
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510045.3% percentile
2.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.1%0.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 13.5%13.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.3%10.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.8%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.3%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos