Topic summary
⁠45%2 analyzed articles/videos330 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adaptation results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Overconfidence Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 979 hits. Analysis detected 5,561 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,862 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (8,912 of 16,562 topics). This Adaptation is better (less manipulative) than 53.80% of the peer group.
Adaptation
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,862
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510046.2% percentile
2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.3%14.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos