Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos2,510 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Sandler results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.4% saturation with 2,548 hits. Analysis detected 11,069 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,040 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (9,767 of 16,562 topics). This Adam Sandler is better (less manipulative) than 59.00% of the peer group.
Adam Sandler
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 10,040
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510041.0% percentile
2.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles10K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 25.4%25.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.3%9.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.1%4.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 25.4%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos