Topic summary
94% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,593 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aca Subsidies results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.6% saturation with 1,966 hits . Analysis detected 16,769 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,540 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 74% (4,440 of 16,562 topics). This Aca Subsidies is worse (more manipulative) than 73.20% of the peer group. Aca Subsidies
Topic details
Total words: 9,540
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.2% percentile 4.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 15.3% 15.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 14.8% 14.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 12.1% 12.1% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 6.5% 6.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 12.2% 12.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 20.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 15.9%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 2.0% Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 4.6% Slippery Slope: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst