Topic summary
⁠49%3 analyzed articles/videos3,045 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abolitionism results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 1,719 hits. Analysis detected 14,790 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,483 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (10,697 of 16,244 topics). This Abolitionism is better (less manipulative) than 65.80% of the peer group.
Abolitionism
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 14,483
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

34% percentile
025507510034.2% percentile
2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles14.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 11.9%11.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.4%9.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.7%11.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.6%5.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos