Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,355 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abduction results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 560 hits. Analysis detected 4,108 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,680 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (7,851 of 16,562 topics). This Abduction is worse (more manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group.
Abduction
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,680
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

53% percentile
025507510052.6% percentile
3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.2%15.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.9%10.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.2%12.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.7%7.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.3%2.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos