Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,312 analyzed words
BS Summary: These 401 K Plans results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 1,147 hits. Analysis detected 8,953 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,248 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (9,408 of 15,689 topics). This 401 K Plans is better (less manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group.
401 K Plans
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 9,248
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

40% percentile
025507510040.0% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.4%12.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.3%6.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.7%9.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos