Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 617 analyzed words
BS Summary: These 100 Foot Rule results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 60.7% saturation with 1,124 hits . Analysis detected 4,403 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,851 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.5% and a BS Rank of 92% (1,427 of 16,562 topics). This 100 Foot Rule is worse (more manipulative) than 91.40% of the peer group. 100 Foot Rule
Topic details
Total words: 1,851
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
91% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 91.4% percentile 9.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 60.7% 60.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 13.2% 13.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 24.1% 24.1% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 9.5% 9.5% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Topic 8.5% 8.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 10.2% 10.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 7.8% 7.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Topic 7.8% 7.8% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Topic 60.7%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 24.1%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 20.9%, sitewide 19.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 3.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 11.1% Anchoring Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 1.9% In-Group Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 6.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Slippery Slope: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 1.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 2.7% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 7.5% Loss Aversion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Horn Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.0% Bandwagon: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst