Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video617 analyzed words
BS Summary: These 100 Foot Rule results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 60.7% saturation with 1,124 hits. Analysis detected 4,403 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,851 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.5% and a BS Rank of 92% (1,427 of 16,562 topics). This 100 Foot Rule is worse (more manipulative) than 91.40% of the peer group.
100 Foot Rule
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,851
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

91% percentile
025507510091.4% percentile
9.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 60.7%60.7%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 13.2%13.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 24.1%24.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 9.5%9.5%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 8.5%8.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 10.2%10.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.8%7.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 7.8%7.8%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 60.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 24.1%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.9%, sitewide 19.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 11.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 7.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Horn Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.0%Bandwagon: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos