Speaker summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video35.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zach Schira results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Unattributed Quote, and Confirmation Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 34.9% saturation with 15 hits. Analysis detected 58 faulty-reasoning hits from 35.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (13,538 of 28,364 speakers). This Zach Schira is worse (more manipulative) than 52.30% of the peer group.
Zach Schira
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 35.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

52% percentile
025507510052.3% percentile
33.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos35.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 34.9%34.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 34.9%34.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 30.2%30.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 34.9%34.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 34.9%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 34.9%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 34.9%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 30.2%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos