Speaker summary
⁠74%1 analyzed article/video29.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zac Brown results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 24.75 hits. Analysis detected 112.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 29.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 55% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (7,332 of 26,730 speakers). This Zac Brown is worse (more manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group.
Zac Brown
Speaker details
Total words: 29.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

73% percentile
025507510072.6% percentile
55.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos29.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%False Dilemma: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.7%False DilemmaSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos