Speaker summary
⁠59%1 analyzed article/video53 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Yale University results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Availability Heuristic, and Overconfidence Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 53 hits. Analysis detected 212 faulty-reasoning hits from 53 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (4,768 of 28,364 speakers). This Yale University is worse (more manipulative) than 83.20% of the peer group.
Yale University
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠84%Yale University (selected)100%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 53
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

83% percentile
025507510083.2% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos53 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos