Author summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,821 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hanna Duggal results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Confirmation Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 595 hits . Analysis detected 4,554 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,284 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of â 42% (3,857 of 6,628 authors). This Hanna Duggal is better (less manipulative) than 58.20% of the peer group. Hanna Duggal
Author details
Total words: 7,284
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.8% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.0% 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.5% 7.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.1%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst