Speaker summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video79 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Yael Schacher results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Straw Man, Framing Effect, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 76.2% saturation with 96 hits. Analysis detected 407.429 faulty-reasoning hits from 79 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 56.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (7,538 of 28,364 speakers). This Yael Schacher is worse (more manipulative) than 73.40% of the peer group.
Yael Schacher
Speaker details
Total words: 79
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

73% percentile
025507510073.4% percentile
56.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos79 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 76.2%76.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 71.4%71.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 76.2%76.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 38.1%38.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 38.1%38.1%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 38.1%38.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 11.9%11.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 76.2%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 76.2%, sitewide 2.0%Straw Man: Speaker 71.4%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 38.1%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 38.1%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 38.1%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 11.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos