Speaker summary
⁠68%1 analyzed article/video56 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wyoming Public Health Laboratory results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Biased Writer Voice, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 55.4% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 155 faulty-reasoning hits from 56 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 55.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (7,621 of 28,364 speakers). This Wyoming Public Health Laboratory is worse (more manipulative) than 73.10% of the peer group.
Wyoming Public Health Laboratory
Speaker details
Total words: 56
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

73% percentile
025507510073.1% percentile
55.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos56 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 55.4%55.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 55.4%55.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 55.4%55.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 55.4%55.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 55.4%55.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 55.4%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 55.4%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 55.4%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 55.4%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 55.4%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos