Speaker summary
⁠85%1 analyzed article/video69 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Women’s Aid results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Bandwagon, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 69 hits. Analysis detected 207 faulty-reasoning hits from 69 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (5,629 of 28,364 speakers). This Women’s Aid is worse (more manipulative) than 80.20% of the peer group.
Women’s Aid
Speaker details
Total words: 69
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

80% percentile
025507510080.2% percentile
75.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos69 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 62.3%62.3%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 37.7%37.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 8.1%Bandwagon: Speaker 62.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 37.7%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos