Author summary
60% 1 analyzed article/video 677 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nic Murray results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 287 hits . Analysis detected 1,414 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,031 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 69% (2,116 of 6,628 authors). This Nic Murray is worse (more manipulative) than 68.10% of the peer group. Nic Murray
Author details
Total words: 2,031
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.1% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.9% 8.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 14.0% 14.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 14.1% 14.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.9%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 14.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 14.0%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Indoctrination: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Tu Quoque: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst