Speaker summary
⁠85%1 analyzed article/video60 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Windhorst results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias and Appeal to Authority, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 66.7% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 100 faulty-reasoning hits from 60 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 55.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (7,611 of 28,364 speakers). This Windhorst is worse (more manipulative) than 73.20% of the peer group.
Windhorst
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 60
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

73% percentile
025507510073.2% percentile
55.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos60 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 66.7%66.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 66.7%66.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 33.3%33.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 66.7%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Speaker 66.7%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos