Speaker summary
77% 3 analyzed articles/videos 382.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These William Tong results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Self-Serving Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 35.4% saturation with 135.431 hits . Analysis detected 796.354 faulty-reasoning hits from 382.5 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 13.7% and a BS Rank of 20% (22,835 of 28,364 speakers). This William Tong is better (less manipulative) than 80.50% of the peer group. William Tong
Speaker details
Total words: 382.5
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.5% percentile 13.7% BS Score3 analyzed videos382.5 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 29.8% 29.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 15.2% 15.2% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 10.5% 10.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 35.4% 35.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 9.3% 9.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 11.8% 11.8% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Speaker 8.7% 8.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 24.8% 24.8% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 3.3% 3.3% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 35.4%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 29.8%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 24.8%, sitewide 19.2% Ad Hominem: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 2.0% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 6.7% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 1.7% Tu Quoque: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst