Speaker summary
⁠74%1 analyzed article/video54.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These William Chou results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 61.5 hits. Analysis detected 143.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 54.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 83.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (5,075 of 28,364 speakers). This William Chou is worse (more manipulative) than 82.10% of the peer group.
William Chou
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 54.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

82% percentile
025507510082.1% percentile
83.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos54.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos