Speaker summary
⁠29%1 analyzed article/video48.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Will Ferrell results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 80 faulty-reasoning hits from 48.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (10,098 of 28,364 speakers). This Will Ferrell is worse (more manipulative) than 64.40% of the peer group.
Will Ferrell
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 48.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

64% percentile
025507510064.4% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos48.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anecdotal: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.7%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos