Speaker summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video16 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wiener results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 72 faulty-reasoning hits from 16 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (5,627 of 28,364 speakers). This Wiener is worse (more manipulative) than 80.20% of the peer group.
Wiener
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 16
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

80% percentile
025507510080.2% percentile
75.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos16 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos